Mitigation Idea: Support research into effectiveness of forestry BMPs
2 comments
Edited: Jul 17, 2018
Here is a possible mitigation option suggested by technical experts for the Appalachian Critical Biodiversity Area:
Support research into the effectiveness of forestry BMPs (best management practices) related to steep slope logging techniques; followed by efforts to adapt the BMPs if/as indicated by the results.
0
John Reinstetle
Jul 17, 2018
University of Kentucky has conducted and documented such research on BMP Effectiveness on Robinson Forest a few years back. This study has been published, the KY BMP Board reviewed and voted to adapt new state BMP guidelines as a result of the study. You can contact UK Dept of Forestry for more details.
Nick Biemiller
Jul 18, 2018
Could a component of this effort also include investing in harvesting equipment that is more appropriate for harvesting on steep slopes (e.g. aerial cable yarding)? Perhaps this could include promotion of logger training and even the creation of a fund that provides capital assistance for contractors to purchase more advanced technology.
Certificate holders can develop and implement tract level setup process that include the use of gps coordinates and other site specific information to help the CH determine if they agree harvesting on a particular tract is the best outcome.
Here is a possible mitigation option suggested by technical experts for the Appalachian Critical Biodiversity Area: Influence state policy to introduce more severe consequences for lack of BMP (best management practice) implementation, in states with lower implementation rates.
Here is a possible mitigation option suggested by technical experts for the Appalachian Critical Biodiversity Area: Improve logger education to increase the implementation of forestry BMPs (best management practices).
Participate in the discussion forum to share ideas and provide feedback about practical actions that companies can take to promote positive impacts on forest management, and reduce the risk of procuring wood from forests where important ecological values are threatened.
The forum is organized by each Regional Meeting with each Specified Risk Topic listed under each meeting:
Asheville (Appalachian Region)
Atlanta (Southeast/Mississippi Alluvial Valley Regions)
Portland (Pacific Coast/Rocky Mountain Regions)
Please post your comments and mitigation ideas under the correct topic. Example: To suggest a mitigation idea for Houston Toad, go into "Atlanta Meeting", find "Houston Toad" and add your comment within that section.
Please keep all comments as succinct as possible, and be respectful of others and their ideas. Moderators will remove any inappropriate content.
If you have any general questions, please fill out the contact form, or email standardsforum@us.fsc.org.
Want to post anonymously? Send your comments with the specific topic to standardsforum@us.fsc.org to be posted.
University of Kentucky has conducted and documented such research on BMP Effectiveness on Robinson Forest a few years back. This study has been published, the KY BMP Board reviewed and voted to adapt new state BMP guidelines as a result of the study. You can contact UK Dept of Forestry for more details.
Could a component of this effort also include investing in harvesting equipment that is more appropriate for harvesting on steep slopes (e.g. aerial cable yarding)? Perhaps this could include promotion of logger training and even the creation of a fund that provides capital assistance for contractors to purchase more advanced technology.