FSC US Admin
Jul 25, 2018

Mitigation Idea: fund, support organizations working to mitigate conversion

0 comments

Here is a possible mitigation option generated through the public consultation:

 

Fund, support organization which strive to mitigate conversion where it occurs. (This option was not assessed using the framework described below.)

NOTE: The final draft of the National Risk Assessment requires that any mitigation options for conversion fit within the following framework (drawn from the U.S. Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy): Actions identified must help to achieve one of the following outcomes:

  1. Convene partners to identify and protect priority forest areas

  2. Promote national policies and markets to help private landowners conserve forests

  3. Provide resources and tools to help communities expand and connect forests

  4. Participate in community growth planning to reduce ecological impacts and wildfire risks

New Posts
  • FSC US Admin
    Jul 25, 2018

    Mitigation Idea: build on opportunities to augment activities already taking place

    Here is a possible mitigation option generated through the public consultation: Mitigation options that build on opportunities to augment or amplify those activities that are already taking place. (This option was not assessed using the framework described below.) NOTE: The final draft of the National Risk Assessment requires that any mitigation options for conversion fit within the following framework (drawn from the U.S. Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy ): Actions identified must help to achieve one of the following outcomes: Convene partners to identify and protect priority forest areas Promote national policies and markets to help private landowners conserve forests Provide resources and tools to help communities expand and connect forests Participate in community growth planning to reduce ecological impacts and wildfire risks
  • FSC US Admin
    Jul 25, 2018

    Mitigation Idea: participate in pooled advocacy programs to promote wood and fiber markets

    Here is a possible mitigation option generated through the public consultation: Participation in pooled advocacy programs promoting wood and fiber markets such as the USDA check-offs would serve as a way to ensure participants are seeking to establish rewards for owning forests. (This option was not assessed using the framework described below.) NOTE: The final draft of the National Risk Assessment requires that any mitigation options for conversion fit within the following framework (drawn from the U.S. Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy ): Actions identified must help to achieve one of the following outcomes: Convene partners to identify and protect priority forest areas Promote national policies and markets to help private landowners conserve forests Provide resources and tools to help communities expand and connect forests Participate in community growth planning to reduce ecological impacts and wildfire risks
  • FSC US Admin
    Jul 25, 2018

    Mitigation Idea: encourage landowners to view timberlands as profitable investments

    Here is a possible mitigation option generated through the public consultation: Mitigation options that encourage landowners view timberlands as profitable investments – if they do not find it too difficult to navigate regulations (and certifications), they will be more likely to replant a forest than convert the land to “higher and better uses” (This option was not assessed using the framework described below.) NOTE: The final draft of the National Risk Assessment requires that any mitigation options for conversion fit within the following framework (drawn from the U.S. Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy ): Actions identified must help to achieve one of the following outcomes: Convene partners to identify and protect priority forest areas Promote national policies and markets to help private landowners conserve forests Provide resources and tools to help communities expand and connect forests Participate in community growth planning to reduce ecological impacts and wildfire risks
Participate in the discussion forum to share ideas and provide feedback about practical actions that companies can take to promote positive impacts on forest management, and reduce the risk of procuring wood from forests where important ecological values are threatened.
​
The forum is organized by each Regional Meeting with each Specified Risk Topic listed under each meeting:
  • Asheville (Appalachian Region)​
  • Atlanta (Southeast/Mississippi Alluvial Valley Regions)
  • Portland (Pacific Coast/Rocky Mountain Regions)
     
Please post your comments and mitigation ideas under the correct topic. Example: To suggest a mitigation idea for Houston Toad, go into "Atlanta Meeting", find "Houston Toad" and add your comment within that section.
​
Please keep all comments as succinct as possible, and be respectful of others and their ideas. Moderators will remove any inappropriate content.
​
If you have any general questions, please fill out the contact form, or email standardsforum@us.fsc.org.
​
Want to post anonymously? Send your comments with the specific topic to standardsforum@us.fsc.org to be posted.

Privacy Policy

​

All photography by Bryan Daugherty unless otherwise noted.