Support research into the effectiveness of forestry BMPs
Support research into the effectiveness of forestry BMPs related to steep slope logging techniques within the Central Appalachian CBA, followed by efforts to adapt the BMPs in associated states if/as indicated by the results
3 comments0 replies
0
Christopher Gibbons
Aug 14, 2018
Why just steep slope?
Overall though, I absolutely support research. The more the better. FSC should be leading the way on this, and... well, we're not.
A research fund, that is explicitly tied to a university, is a great idea. As long as it's not the only option. Because, money, small CHs... etc.
Ashley Hawk
Oct 12, 2018
I support any on-the-ground research that can potentially improve current practices. Recent studies have shown their effectiveness on water quality, for both warm waters and designated high-quality waters in this region. However, research should extend beyond logging techniques for steep slopes and further address other types of land topography as they relate to logging operations. Strong research to support how BMPs are effective – and what further actions can be done to improve their effectiveness – will go a long way in reducing risk of negative impacts on these important water resources.
Andrew Goldberg
Oct 12, 2018
This is a ongoing hot topic for reserach across the South. We will always need up to date scientific information to inform FSC forestry. Would need to have audtiable ways to meet this mitigation measure. For example is it only funding or could advocacy within the state land grant research university systems be sufficient?
Demonstrate contributions/participation in efforts related to conserving aquatic biodiversity within the Central Appalachian CBA; consider contributions to FSC that are pooled and used together to maximize their impact
Participate in the discussion forum to share ideas and provide feedback about practical actions that companies can take to promote positive impacts on forest management, and reduce the risk of procuring wood from forests where important ecological values are threatened.
The forum is organized by each Regional Meeting with each Specified Risk Topic listed under each meeting:
Asheville (Appalachian Region)
Atlanta (Southeast/Mississippi Alluvial Valley Regions)
Portland (Pacific Coast/Rocky Mountain Regions)
Please post your comments and mitigation ideas under the correct topic. Example: To suggest a mitigation idea for Houston Toad, go into "Atlanta Meeting", find "Houston Toad" and add your comment within that section.
Please keep all comments as succinct as possible, and be respectful of others and their ideas. Moderators will remove any inappropriate content.
If you have any general questions, please fill out the contact form, or email standardsforum@us.fsc.org.
Want to post anonymously? Send your comments with the specific topic to standardsforum@us.fsc.org to be posted.
Why just steep slope?
Overall though, I absolutely support research. The more the better. FSC should be leading the way on this, and... well, we're not.
A research fund, that is explicitly tied to a university, is a great idea. As long as it's not the only option. Because, money, small CHs... etc.
I support any on-the-ground research that can potentially improve current practices. Recent studies have shown their effectiveness on water quality, for both warm waters and designated high-quality waters in this region. However, research should extend beyond logging techniques for steep slopes and further address other types of land topography as they relate to logging operations. Strong research to support how BMPs are effective – and what further actions can be done to improve their effectiveness – will go a long way in reducing risk of negative impacts on these important water resources.
This is a ongoing hot topic for reserach across the South. We will always need up to date scientific information to inform FSC forestry. Would need to have audtiable ways to meet this mitigation measure. For example is it only funding or could advocacy within the state land grant research university systems be sufficient?