Lack of specificity

I've read through the 4 draft mitigation options that are available as of this morning. I find them very similar, vague, and not at all what I was expecting. I expected this process to result in a simply list of actionable choices that a certificate holder could choose between. It think that it will take a lot of additional resources and time to implement any of these options.

Participate in the discussion forum to share ideas and provide feedback about practical actions that companies can take to promote positive impacts on forest management, and reduce the risk of procuring wood from forests where important ecological values are threatened.

The forum is organized by each Regional Meeting with each Specified Risk Topic listed under each meeting:

Asheville (Appalachian Region)
Atlanta (Southeast/Mississippi Alluvial Valley Regions)
Portland (Pacific Coast/Rocky Mountain Regions)

Please post your comments and mitigation ideas under the correct topic. Example: To suggest a mitigation idea for Houston Toad, go into "Atlanta Meeting", find "Houston Toad" and add your comment within that section.

Lack of specificity

Participate in the discussion forum to share ideas and provide feedback about practical actions that companies can take to promote positive impacts on forest management, and reduce the risk of procuring wood from forests where important ecological values are threatened.

The forum is organized by each Regional Meeting with each Specified Risk Topic listed under each meeting:

Asheville (Appalachian Region)

Atlanta (Southeast/Mississippi Alluvial Valley Regions)

Portland (Pacific Coast/Rocky Mountain Regions)

Please post your comments and mitigation ideas under the correct topic. Example: To suggest a mitigation idea for Houston Toad, go into "Atlanta Meeting", find "Houston Toad" and add your comment within that section.

Please keep all comments as succinct as possible, and be respectful of others and their ideas. Moderators will remove any inappropriate content.

If you have any general questions, please fill out the contact form, or email standardsforum@us.fsc.org.

Want to post anonymously? Send your comments with the specific topic to standardsforum@us.fsc.org to be posted.

Lack of specificity

Participate in the discussion forum to share ideas and provide feedback about practical actions that companies can take to promote positive impacts on forest management, and reduce the risk of procuring wood from forests where important ecological values are threatened.

​

The forum is organized by each Regional Meeting with each Specified Risk Topic listed under each meeting:

Asheville (Appalachian Region)​

Atlanta (Southeast/Mississippi Alluvial Valley Regions)

Portland (Pacific Coast/Rocky Mountain Regions)

Please post your comments and mitigation ideas under the correct topic. Example: To suggest a mitigation idea for Houston Toad, go into "Atlanta Meeting", find "Houston Toad" and add your comment within that section.

​

Please keep all comments as succinct as possible, and be respectful of others and their ideas. Moderators will remove any inappropriate content.

​

If you have any general questions, please fill out the contact form, or email standardsforum@us.fsc.org.

​

Want to post anonymously? Send your comments with the specific topic to standardsforum@us.fsc.org to be posted.

Asheville (Appalachian Region)